I was just a year out of college, and interviewing for a sales assistant position at PaineWebber.
One of my prospective bosses offered me $24,000. I countered with $27,000. He pulled out his calculator like a gun from a holster, punched in $3,000, divided it by 52, and in a clipped tone responded, "That's only $57 more a week, why do you care?"
To which I responded, "Precisely".
PaineWebber subsequently agreed to $27k. I took the job. Two years hence my bosses championed my hop, one that rarely happens in the investment banking world, from the admin to a professional track.
And I tucked away in my brain the belief -- 'nice girls can ask'.
Source: istockphoto
Nearly two decades later, I recognize that my experience with this employer was anomalous.
'Nice girls can't ask' has tended to more true.
For example, at the end of 2004, I'd had a great year at Merrill Lynch. From stock-picking to commission dollars to peer reviews, I was top of the class. Surely I was on solid ground when I conveyed to management that I expected to be a top 10% earner. Instead I was told I was out-of-line. And yep, you guessed it, my pay wasn't in the top 10% -- it wasn't even top quartile.
Which is why I wasn't at all surprised when I recently read about an academic study in a Washington Post article Salary, Gender and the Social Cost of Haggling, the findings of which are summarized below.
Although it may well be true that women often hurt themselves by not trying to negotiate, this study found that both men and women were more likely to subtly penalize women who asked for more, the perception being that women who asked for more were 'less nice'. 'What we found across all the studies is men were always less willing to work with a woman who had attempted to negotiate than with a woman who did not. 'They always preferred to work with a woman who stayed mum.'
Source: istockphoto
Use your words. Ask for what you want. My experience and this study indicate there can be a social cost when women negotiate. A cost that is consistent with the findings of Cornell professor Anna Fels' findings: when we are giving something to someone else, we are feminine; when we are asking for something from someone, we are not.
It's a double bind.
I don't have an answer. But, I do have some thoughts:
- I was relieved to read about this study, to recognize that my professional rebuff was due to societal norms; it wasn't about me per se.
- If we are reluctant to ask for what we want, maybe we aren't being wimpy, but calculating the social cost of asking.
- I am both surprised, but mostly appreciative, of my bosses at PaineWebber who were willing to negotiate with me -- and still wanted to work with me.I want, I need to, be nice -- to be attuned to others' needs.
AND
I want to, I need to, ask for what I want.
Being my self depends on it.
What are your thoughts?
For more on my work experiences, you can read:
- HBR's How Star Women Build Portable Skills
- The Hazards of Getting in the Game
- Valuing What Women Do
- Sucker Punch
- Telling My Wall Street Story
- The Allure of the Pom-Pom
For further reading, you may enjoy Nice Girls Don't Get Raises which offers up another explanation for the gender pay gap, as well Gender Stereotypes and the Double Binds for Women in Leadership, which explains 'professional women are generally considered ill-equipped to handle jobs traditionally held by men AND we typically induce disapproval and social penalties when we are successful in these positions'.
P.S. Thanks to Stacey Petrey for forwarding me the Washington Post article.
Great (though sobering) post. I'm curious what happened with your career at Merril Lynch after 2004. I would have felt inclined to say - pay up or I'm working for your competitor.
Posted by: Julia | July 11, 2009 at 09:30 PM
So interesting. I think of that old Virgina Slims slogan ("You've come a long way baby...") sometimes when I see opportunities that women have today if they choose them. And when I hear things like this, I get a bit frustrated. Especially that based on merit, you should have been earning more. I guess there is still a long way to go in some situations...
Posted by: Macy Robison | July 11, 2009 at 09:37 PM
I think that the point is somewhat missed. Negotiation, shemogtiation! All bull! Women or men it matters not. There is one question that every single person in a "management" position must ask one's self to be successful if they want a successful working group with which they are tasked. Can I have that really hard conversation with an employee? Those of you who know what I mean, know what I mean, I mean the results, do or walk, can you sit in a room and terminate someones employment conversation.I would say that 15% really can do it somewhat effectively and that explains the 85% of the really bad managers in corporate America who simply can't, or will not.
Posted by: Jim Nolan | July 11, 2009 at 10:35 PM
"I want to, I need to, ask for what I want.
Being my self depends on it." This quote from your post bothers me, but I am not quite sure why.
Probably it is because I have found that focusing too much on what I want leaves me unhappy and selfish. Yes, my personal needs must be met, but focusing too much on myself simply does not work. I have found that I must lose myself to find myself.
Posted by: Shawnie | July 11, 2009 at 10:46 PM
This hits very close to home this week as, crossing fingers, will be interviewing for two equally dreamy jobs. Hopefully I can take some of the lessons learned in the reading when it comes time to discuss money.
Posted by: Emily | July 12, 2009 at 04:17 AM
Asking for what we want/need is very difficult, but it is so beneficial in preventing martyrdom, avoiding resentment, and opening the door for honest communication. I think NOT asking can actually be more selfish in the long run since it can lead to huge problems (see list above!). It is challenging to find a balance between the two extremes.
Posted by: Janika | July 12, 2009 at 08:13 AM
On the other side of the coin...
Recently, I interviewed someone for a position at my company who was not happy with the salary number. I was surprised because I pay my employees roughly 20% above the market rate for this position - so I consider the salary generous. I pay high because I want my employees to feel well compensated and because I believe it affects work quality. Plus, they deserve a good piece of the pie.
Normally, however, I would've caved at this candidate's dissatisfaction - immediately given him a higher number to quell his displeasure. Instead, I realized that I cannot give him a higher salary and meet my financial obligations. My salary structure is well thought out, generous and reasonable. I asked myself what I want - and I gave it to myself. I asked myself proverbially, "Am I allowed to keep a portion of the company income for myself?" I answered, "Yes!" Sometimes it's so hard to say yes to ourselves!
p.s. I wonder if this unwillingness to ask for what we want financially stems from the historical precedence of men defining our monetary worth. For centuries, women were viewed as property - the value of which was solely defined by men. I can't imagine that we have completely shaken this legacy out of our subconscious system.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 12, 2009 at 09:01 AM
shawnie you make an interesting point. i agree with you that service is an important component self concept. that said, you can't draw from an empty well. i always think about this when i am on an airplane and the flight attendant says "put your airbag on first and then help those around you."
i think we are more useful to those around us when we are getting the things we need. i think i am the first person i need to help. i believe that in choosing myself first i will be more interesting, more fulfilled, and feel like I have more to give those around me.
far from being selfish, choosing me, asking for what i want, and getting what i need are some of the best ways i can prepare myself to serve others.
Posted by: Mercedes | July 12, 2009 at 12:45 PM
I have often felt this phenomenon, and often "don't ask" because of the possible social consequences. It does really put women in a bind. I don't have a solution. Do you ask for more precisely so you DON'T reinforce the stereotypical woman's behavior, but then sacrifice the social consequences?
Posted by: Margaret Woolley Busse | July 12, 2009 at 07:40 PM
I'm interested in the social cost of asking portion, and wonder how that translates into our own homes, and community, where monetary pay isn't what we're seeking.
Posted by: Amy Jo | July 12, 2009 at 09:06 PM
I find it disturbing that we're relegated to a choice of worth or societal conformity. Why can't I get paid what I'm worth just because I'm a woman? I've never understood why women have to prove so much more than men, and why the punitive consequences are so much harsher when we try. But do the articles explain it so we can change it, or are they being published so that those in charge of saying "no" aren't held accountable for denying us?
I've never had a career that involved pay negotiation. I've never had to justify my dollar value to someone else, but just the thought of having to explain why I'm worth the money to someone looking at my credentials gives me the (angry) shivers--it shouldn't be so subjective if you have the experience to back it up and the proof right there in print.
Posted by: lisle | July 12, 2009 at 11:14 PM
I work in a traditionally female dominated field (education), but my bosses have nearly always been men who make a LOT more money than I do. The answer is easy, right? Become an admin. The problem is that to do so would be to reject nearly every reason I love the education process in the first place.
Teacher salaries will never reach any degree of competitiveness as long as a teacher's salary is seen as "secondary" and as long as attitudes like the ones cited here remain the norm. Male legislators, and administrators have nearly total control over teacher wages--this is a realm where women still need to make many inroads. In the mean time, we'll stay busy educating the next generation.
Posted by: Nan | July 13, 2009 at 12:53 PM
"Nice" is a loaded word. It is so overused that it has become both meaningless and burdened with meanings that seem synonymous with weakness and passivity.
I have a good friend, mother of 8 children, who is brilliant. She walked away from a Ph.D. program and a likely career as an academic superstar, because she really wanted to be a mother, an opportunity that came to her later than she originally anticipated. (Obviously she has made up for lost time.)
I once said to her, "I want my children to be nice." She retorted, "I don't want my children to be nice. I want them to be good and strong." If one adds experience to goodness and strength, the result frequently is wisdom. We should all aspire to be wise--able to see the larger picture and our appropriate place in it, then strong enough to defend both our own and others' place in it.
My husband is a successful CEO. As a VP at a former company, he had to engineer a huge lay-off. When a local paper interviewed him about the lay-offs, my husband said something to the effect of: "If you are going to be a successful businessman, you better be willing to do it. However, you should also feel like hell about it." In other words, make the hard choices, but always be aware of the human element of any situation.
Posted by: EHD | July 13, 2009 at 01:43 PM
This is a bit of a tangent. Not sure if Whitney intended for the discussion to become grounded in salary negotiation.:) But...
In January 2009, I raised my company's rates by 20%. What, you say? "Raised" your rates in the middle of a plummeting economy? Yup.
Guess what? My business doubled.
The reason I raised the rates was because I realized that my prior rates lacked one thing - integrity. My prior rates were not a true reflection of the fair market value for my company's work; consequently, the rates were dishonest. The rates did not represent the quality and value that we offered. Once I stood confidently in the truth of the market value of my company's services, the clients started pouring in.
I believe this phenomenon occurred because all of us are inexplicably attracted to authenticity, strength and confidence. When we see someone perform their "art," whatever that may be (dancing, teaching, trading stocks, cooking a meal, etc.), from a place of deeply knowing its worth to him or herself and the world, it's beautiful - and we want to behold it, and be part of it.
Posted by: Janna | July 13, 2009 at 02:15 PM
p.s. EHD - I loved your husband's comment!
Posted by: Janna | July 13, 2009 at 02:17 PM
Janna, I love what you said about integrity and authenticity. I had never thought of that before. Profound.
Posted by: Maria Carr | July 13, 2009 at 11:15 PM
GREAT post. This does apply to so many other arenas, not just work and pay. Same questions. What is the cost of asking for what we want? And how does this affect what we get, or what we settle for? Interesting food for thought.
Posted by: Jenny | July 13, 2009 at 11:49 PM
You are all giving me SO much to think about. I think that maybe we are going to need a follow-up post on this topic.
Posted by: Whitney Johnson | July 14, 2009 at 06:51 PM
Janna! Thank you. I have always seen my teaching as an art. A passion. I know that its worth to myself is far beyond money. And yet . . . .
While none of us should ever feel a need to put a dollar amount on our "worth," it is very nice to get out of bed in the morning and go to a job where you feel compensated according to your creativity, diligence, talent and drive.
Posted by: Nan | July 14, 2009 at 08:27 PM
Thank you for sharing that! In my past, I was a financial analyst who worked alongside men. I was the only female in my group. I felt like it really upped my game being around men, but it DID bring out the bulldog in me. I had no choice. The second I walked into work, I would have my "game face" on. No being girly. However, I did run into many roadblocks that you mentioned (about money). After usually stellar yearly reviews, I would ask for a raise. Usually I received a measly % increase, barely able to keep up with inflation, right? Later, I found out my male counterparts received considerable raises. They were making far more than I and I was furious. I ended up quitting and starting my own business. It definitely fueled the fire for me.
Posted by: Mary Carstens | July 16, 2009 at 10:12 AM